Deal v15mr1hj

Under dispute

The release is frozen while the arbiter reviews the evidence.

Amount149.00 USDC
ItemAurora Buds
MerchantNorthline
Held by escrow149.00 USDC
On-chain stateDISPUTED
Merchant wallet0xD934…fBb8

Where the money is

Left the buyer's wallet149.00 USDC
Signed by the buyer, confirmed on Base Sepolia0x808045…cdcfa2
Held by the escrow contract149.00 USDC
Nobody can move this, including Mercuryo0x8d8000…0ff6e8
Received by Northline0.00 USDC
Nothing until the window closes or a verdict says so

Every line above is a real transaction on Base Sepolia and can be opened on the block explorer. The one thing the demo fakes is the wallet prompt: a test key signs for the buyer instead of MetaMask. What each wallet holds right now.

Transactions

Payment into escrow0x808045…cdcfa2

Dispute

escalated to a human
Arbitration verdictheld for review

Decision

Sent to a human reviewer

Proposed to the buyer

74.50 USDC

Proposed to the merchant

74.50 USDC

Established facts

  1. 01The carrier’s independent record shows the parcel with tracking number TRK-5120-7741 was delivered in Amsterdam with a recipient signature on 2026-08-31.Carrier record (independent of both parties)
  2. 02The listing described Aurora Buds, Grade B, with 88% battery and active noise cancelling.Listing as it stood at the time of sale
  3. 03The buyer states the earbuds are the correct model but reports crackling in the right earbud at low volume and heavier scratching on the case than they believe Grade B should allow.Statement by the buyer
  4. 04The merchant states the earbuds passed an audio test before packing and that Grade B allows light cosmetic marks, but provides no test records or photos of the actual unit shipped.Statement by the merchant

Rule applied

A3 — Delivered but impaired

Delivery is independently confirmed, and both sides agree the correct model arrived, so this is not a non-delivery or wrong-item case. The only evidence about functional defect and excess wear is the buyer’s detailed statement versus the merchant’s unsubstantiated assurance of prior testing; with no objective proof either way, the most reasonable interpretation is that the item arrived but may be partially impaired relative to its stated Grade B condition. Under A3, that kind of potential loss in value is best reflected by splitting the escrow rather than fully favoring either side. Held for a human reviewer: confidence 0.53 is below the 0.7 threshold.

Confidence

0.53

Arbiter model

gpt-5.1

Signature

not signed

Executed on chain

nothing moved

Contractual arbitration under the terms both parties accepted at checkout. It is not a court ruling and does not remove either side's right to go to one.

Case file · 5 exhibits
StatementBuyer

The earbuds arrived and they are the right model, but the right one crackles at low volume and the case is scratched more than Grade B should be. I did not take a photo before I put them back in the box. It is my word against theirs, but they are not worth what I paid.

Listing at time of saleCollected by Assure
Grade
Grade B
Image
/products/aurora-buds.png
Title
Aurora Buds
Battery
88%
Subtitle
Active noise cancelling
Declared Weight Grams
58
Carrier trackingCollected by Assure
Events
4 entries
Status
DELIVERED
Carrier
Meridian Express
Delivered At
2026-08-31T13:26:21.179Z
Tracking Number
TRK-5120-7741
Recipient Signature
S. HAWKINS
Declared Weight Grams
58
Measured Weight Grams
61
Merchant profileCollected by Assure
Source
Mercuryo Hub · merchant risk profile
Kyc Tier
verified business
Dispute Rate
0
Deals Settled
1
Account Age Days
412
Disputes Opened
0
StatementMerchant

These were listed as Grade B, which explicitly allows light cosmetic marks on the case. The audio path was tested at our bench before packing and passed. We have no recording of the test and cannot reproduce the crackling the buyer describes.

← back to Northline